Hi all,
I'm struggling to see why MTR (Metal Tiger) only dropped 20% on the AIM on Friday. The valuations of the two companies are summarized below (if my table displays correctly):
* "Valuation Botswana" is just the current Mkt Cap minus the Mkt Cap before discovery.
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 0 Pre-Discovery Pre-assays Post-assays Shares on issue Warrants/Options Fully diluted 1 MTL (GBP cents)[/B] 0.8 5.08 4.05 446,134,795 26,170,000 472,304,795 2 MOD (AUD cents) 0.4 4.1 2.6 1,184,603,328 80,933,441 1,265,536,769 3 4 Valuation Valuation (Botswana) Ownership 5 MTL MktCap (GBP) 3,778,438 23,993,084 19,128,344 15,349,906 6 MTL MktCap (AUD) 7,027,895 44,627,135 35,578,720 28,550,825 30% 7 MOD MktCap (AUD) 5,062,147 51,887,008 32,903,956 27,841,809 70%
When converted to $AUD (and fully diluted), MTR and MOD currently have very similar valuations ($28.5m vs. $27.8m). Before discovery, their market capitalizations were broadly similar ($7m vs $5m) so there are no other projects which are having an affect on the valuations at the moment.
If the AIM market values the Botswana project at around AUD$28m for 30%, then surely MOD should possess a higher valuation? Or is this the "capital raise" discount we are seeing?
Food for thought.
Hi all, I'm struggling to see why MTR (Metal Tiger) only dropped...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?