In there deep. The Democrats rejected a less redacted form of...

In there deep. The Democrats rejected a less redacted form of the report. There are laws about grand jury evidence that have to be followed. Barr didn't have to give any of the report, as there were NO recommendations for inictmemts of any crimes. In fact there was no crime to investigate in the 1st place.
It's as if someone who didn't like me, called in that I had drugs in my car. They pull me over and an officer plants the drugs knowing there was none there to begin with. I tell everyone I can, the police planted the drugs. I go to the Mayor and tell him/her they planted the drugs and the officer should be fired. He gets fired but because of another infraction. They appoint someone to investigate my case for 2 years, during which the local newspapers write that I'm guilty over and over again. I scream blue-murder and say the invesigating officer should also be fired. They finally finish the investigation and low and behold they find the drugs were planted by the officers on duty that original night. They and the Mayor pronouce me not guilty of drug possession. Now even though there was NO crime they want to prosecute me for trying to defend myself and calling for the firing of the original officer and the investigating officer. They also want to know every little detail of everyone that was interviewed, depositioned and supoenaed. Bollocks to them. I have rights in the US, as do all the people interviewed especially under a grand jury.
If the original special counsel investigation was to look for Russian collusion/conspiracy/interference then all of it should be in the report. This was a focused investigation of the President of the United States. That's an awful precedent to set whatever your politics may be, even if you dislike a persons code of morals and ethics.
Planting drugs on a drug dealer is still not the right way to go and is illegal.

This was the 3rd time they went after Manafort. You should look up who was involved the 1st two times.
Peter Strzok had to be let go by Meuller along with a few others.
Andrew Weissman has his own history with both Mueller and evidence. Just ask anyone from Authur Andersen.

Rosenstein wrote in his resignation letter. “We enforce the law without fear or favor because credible evidence is not partisan, and truth is not determined by opinion polls. We ignore fleeting distractions and focus our attention on the things that matter because a republic that endures is not governed by the news cycle. We keep the faith, we follow the rules, and we always put America first."

So much more to come.

As I've stated before I wouldn't have Trump on my snooker team and he probably cheats at golf, but he's not a pro and is only cheating himself. I imagine he enjoys himself.
I do give credit the President for accomplishing things under the constant scutiny that most would have said and still say he couldn't.
Not a fan of Rosenstein either and would play golf with Trump before Rosenstein.