Hi Wildcat77,I didn't scale the Upper Angwa depth map back from...

Hi Wildcat77,

I didn't scale the Upper Angwa depth map back from the ~200sqkm number that IVZ had originally mentioned. I just used the most recent Upper Angwa depth map they have released. I've mentioned in Slide 1 below the key reasons for the likely reduction in size, albeit the original 200sqkm number seems to have come from the top Lower Angaw map and not the top Upper Angwa - but I wouldn't think due to their structural conformity on the seismic that their closure areas would be materially different.

I would think, from what we currently know from the two wells, that any area / fault block within structural closureat the Upper and Lower Angwa levels will be hydrocarbon charged.

Cheers
VOGC