Anyone, Kelbys..anyone..Dave R...anyone
TELL ME WHAT MURDOCH GOT OUT OF BACKING KEVIN MICHAEL RUDD/LABOR in 2007?
Your so called hypothesis is that Murdoch backs a party for his and his company's gain.
6 years of the clowns "he" put in..according to your rationale..what has be got?
Speak up, roll up, have your say, don't delay.
Otherwise..
1. Shut up.
2. Start your own media company/newspaper, whatever.
By the way, Rudd DID get in because of Murdoch in 2007.
The shameful truth you are desperate not to face, and in usual fashion, want to twist into something unrecognisable, is that with or without Murdoch's opinion, Australia is fed up with the (allegedly) Australian Labor Party in 2013.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- murdoch will rule
murdoch will rule, page-87
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)