Share
199 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 82
clock Created with Sketch.
17/02/22
22:18
Share
Originally posted by Badaw:
↑
Hi all, For a company to make an acquisition under this condition, the management is desperate to make some easy bonuses, based on EBITDA. I hate to say this, but as a holder, this deal stinks!! I can't believe the management is prepared to pay a premium( with so much uncertainty ) for a company that make $20m in revenue. This should of mean that Haloo food should of been valued at $60m(equates to $0.2 a share). Considering that mummy's products might be produed by a third party, that is even worst. Buying an intellectual property without any real physical property for $20m is rubish! I suspect some dirty work is being done around this ground!! I encourage holders to show the middle finger for this deal. for a company that can't even make a profit and keeps sinking itself in more debt is even worse. Sound like a set up for failure!! Management should focus on improving margins and get some value back to shareholders, not destroy it. Once profit become more stable, then acquistions maybe welcomed. It looks like a mate's deal to me !!
Expand
I felt the same way with super cubes. A mates sort of deal.Since then the founder has left the business completely and super cubes no longer being profitable. So many smokes and mirrors with this company and its all out of the expense of shareholders
Last edited by
Kass93 :
17/02/22