how does voting against the updated offer turn your against the 14.6 offer into essentially a for? (accepting that amount, as you've indicated). That makes no sense whatsoever. Didn't Pfizer and the bod have to submit this amendment to the courts before it could be adjusted in the scheme? Why do they need us to approve the increased offer??? Seriously, where is the logic in this?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RAP
- My Analysis: No synergy value in valuation
My Analysis: No synergy value in valuation, page-123
Currently unlisted. Proposed listing date: 4 SEPTEMBER 2024 #
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 78 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)