my questions..., page-3

Kent-
DYE makes an 'ingredient' not a 'loaf of bread'.
Do you follow?DYE makes 'muck' that Others use to Manufacture Products.[Corus,G something or other Consumer Products,Pilkington to make Glass]
DYE is not making any of this but supplying a Muck coating to 'electrify' them.
Thus their Cash Flow is not from sales of 'stuff' but just of the Muck for others to experiment with while DYE with Corus concentrate on getting their Commercial Production together.

So 2009 'loss' was caused by the commissioning of Two Lab Facilities suitable to produce sufficient quantities for Corus and any other 'Researchers'.
DYE has a Cash Flow sufficient to meet Costs but NOT large Capital Expenditure like new factories.

Furthermore it's relying on Large MultiNational Companies to make 'stuff' that uses Dye's Muck.Dyesol will then license/make money from the Use of their IP technology 'method'.

So kent there's No Profits/Cash Flow Major until and unless some Multi National adopts this 'fabulous' Technology and pays DYE ie us shareholders.

Main Thing,Kent is DYEsol is NOT going to build the buildings using their Muck to power them.They're not even going to manufacture the components[steel/glass etc]
They're just going to sell the Ingredient Dye Muck to others.

hope you follow.
cheerio.