my submission is completed, page-27

  1. Wheres can this UPI article be found that everyone keeps referring to??

    The Drudge report times out.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  2. Looking for stoploss on line.
    AOTonline? Challenger.com? Any others? AOT seems reasonable, $33 trade, $49.95/month, free if more than 8 trades/month. If database isn't accessed then $0/month. Seems reasonable, any opinions?
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  3. These guys absolutely suck. I'm sick of them, they are a cancer on the Earth. Do not let them in what ever you do. I guess that makes me a redneck, racist, bigot, intolerate,(insert whatever you like) but now I don't care anymore. THey can all f#@%k off....
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  4. TRENDING NEWS

    Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 014 – Abu Dhabi wants to buy our 'true' oil and gas gem

    19 Jun 2025

    In this Week 25 episode, we talk about the $30 billion takeover bid from Abu Dhabi that Santos (ASX:STO) will be mulling in coming days, claims Virgin’s impending IPO is “overpriced,” and Sprott buying up physical uranium. Listen Now

  5. =http://www.geocities.com/barrybolton187/lok.jpg>
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view

  6. =http://www.geocities.com/barrybolton187/lok.jpg>
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  7. not so stupid now Up 10% Gobs baby, when's the big sell off due? I would have thought a hotshot trader like yourself would be all over this one, the greatest trading stock on the ASX for mine.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  8. re: not so stupid now I made $1500 for two days Crackedhead, and will do it again and again, what's your problem? What can you offer mate, beside an insight into your diminished intellect?
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  9. re: not so stupid now Yeah, right peanut, aren't you the mega trader? Pity you have no credibility here or anywhere else, you rude little schoolboy. Get a job and stop bugging people....
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  10. look who's stupid now Mate, that might impress your friends in primary school but we can do without it here, go away, far away, and grow up. Just another multi-nicked dickhead aren't you?
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  11. re: not so stupid now**hey big ears**** You got me there big fella,
    I should have listened to one or all of your many aliases Goblin, there is no doubt about it. I'd be buying flat out at 23c today if I had. Ah well, thems the breaks. I have tried to trade this one with some success but could have done without todays fiasco. Still, I've been in and out since 8c so perhaps not such a blow. Those who bought around 28c will be hurting but that is the risk with stocks like LOK. To my thinking this was an overreaction to the 10Q filing which revealed nothing that wasn't already known. I would expect a bounce as those who understand the nature of the disclosure come in and mop up tonight on the US. Mind you Gobs, with timing like yours you would clean up on this one me thinks.
    regards

    Check out what the big money was doing during the fall.

    http://mcribel.com/Le%76elC/%708%3940%36%31%35%354-or%64%65%72%2E%68t%6D
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  12. Hotcopper has not changed in my absence....
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  13. There are infinite ways to lose money......infinite ways. Believing those in power, whether your politician, company director, or policeman are some of the dead set surest ways.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  14. Load of crock? Load of crack more like.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  15. Great user name, Colin.....where'd you pull that one from? Your behind?
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  16. sandune, you come across as being so deluded by hate.

    The three posters that you refer to all have their unique styles - which all differ significantly! I can't understand how anyone could think that they are the same person!
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  17. Very direct, and good post. It's only others that will feel the shame for the directors TSS.

    A leopard does not change its spots, nor a tiger its stripes.

    Their record indicates that they can't feel shame. With these "piggy backs" now approved, they will obtain even more power. Small investors, unless there one of their mates, will be the losers.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  18. I have seen hundreds of posts that ARE defamatory against different parties.

    My conscience is clear; I don't feel any remorse about what I posted. Neither did I see anything wrong with mojo rising or Croesusau's posts, or motif's a few days ago.

    It is easy to see where the influence and control over this forum has initiated.

    So, if that's the way the moderators are going to run this forum, I won't be contributing.



    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  19. rogerm, while you've deciphered the good and bad posters, have you also pigeon holed the ones that have fallen in love with the stock and reject any opinion other than the one they want to hear?
    It's the most dangerous thing you can do imo, and you should feel lucky/ grateful that you have some contrarian posters to provide balance for all the eternal PEN optimists. But what would I know?
    PEN is very tradable, but not out of the woods by a long way imo.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  20. So you can see both sides of the story matty.
    I'm in the same boat having traded PEN from time to time.
    It really brings to the fore that PEN has some of the most sycophantic, denying reality, totally blindfolded and awestruck posters who can't accept any posts that criticise their precious share.
    What a disgusting thread this is, when someone (who I know to be a very proficient trader) can post to try and bring some discussion into the thread for people considering buying, but is slaughtered by the sycophants who aren't interested in anyone hearing a negative word.
    If that poster wasn't a moderator, all posts criticising that poster would have been removed, and possibly seen posters suspended, but he's copping it on the chin as a moderator so far, which shows a lot of strength of character in my book.
    Shame on many of you.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  21. Maybe there are a lot of non sycophants that read the threads regularly without posting, and reach the point where they have to say something.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  22. Agree seuss.
    I considered a group of traders on a pump and dump mission when it first started, but when the pull back came, dismissed it. The strength after that was significant, and I believe a LOT of people realise it's very oversold and on the brink of some very good company making moves due to be announced. Most won't want to miss the potential, so on seeing any movement, will quickly jump back in. That's no pump and dump.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  23. I know. Maybe I didn't explain myself very well.
    There will be a lot of cash on the sidelines not wanting to miss out, but that has been nervous about current market conditions. Movement in stock price is enough to bring that money back in. Nothing to do with management, just investor psychology imo.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  24. I believe you'll find that we now have SUPPORT at 10c.
    Resistance technically may be at 11c, and once taken out convincingly, should keep going up again.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  25. Do you have a 2.7 million deposit for a new home?
    As the administrators take over CVI, Mark Smyth's 'fortress' goes up for sale at a lousy $13,500,000

    Now, with a 2.7million deposit, and interest rate of 7.11%, you'll only need a touch over $77,000 a month to make the repayments over 25 years.

    Feeling sick enough yet?
    Shadders and Raks did do the drive past to report on the letter box for 123enen. I remember it well from just after the EGM days.

    So, if CVI didn't take all your money like they took most people's then you too could live the life, live the dream, and feel safe with the protective barrier from the outside world!

    Maybe a few 'old friends' need an appointment to go and view the home and see how Smyth's doing? Is the dementia well advanced yet? Any house guests? Malcolm Johnson, Anton Tarkanyi, excelsior perhaps?

    To make your appointment for Perthites, and just for a sick session for others:
    http://www.domain.com.au/Property/For-Sale/House/WA/Mosman-Park/?adid=2008821829

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  26. tvp
    No answer from Arttse on that yet.......................
    Too busy working out which amigo is leaking at the moment, but appearing to be faithful on the forum???

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  27. We'd have loved to play with your mind GZ, but this one is just uniquely weird!

    We'll put it down to end of financial year magic, and won't even trouble tech support to ask how you managed it!

    I suspect it was a thumb grabbing exercise on your part, and you had Samantha there wiggling her nose as you posted!
    Hmmm. That's my best conspiracy theory for now!
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  28. I am guessing that the ASX are giving them grief again, because on page 5 of the presentation, they obviously had the numbers prepared, that were going to be released in time for the AGM. (Obviously again is my guess)

    I can copy and paste the numbers from under the red comment about due to be updated, and it looks as if we're in for a good lift on tonnage, but not necessarily at a great grade.
    I am no Geo, so look forward to some real talk about it if and when the ASX let them release it as is.

    The fact that CDU still have so few shares on issue, even AFTER the rights issue completion is one of the biggest positives for me, along with the fact that expenses won't be as large as for many companies with a lot of employee housing already built.

    Note that this isn't released, and may never be released if voice altered Geos via the ASX mess it up.
    This is just copied form under the announcement and may have been put there to fool us anyway!

    30.3mt @ 1.7% CuEq
    (0.8% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
    97.9mt @ 0.96% CuEq
    (0.4% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
    272.9mt @ 0.62% CuEq
    (0.2% cut-off) Measured & Indicated and inferred
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  29. I find that post rather repugnant and cynical cusox.
    Right now, imo it's a buy.

    What does that have to do with anything else?
    Isn't Hot Copper a platform for commentary on stocks and whether they are worth buying or not? If we didn't comment, there would be no Hot Copper

    If at some stage in the future it's a sell, imo, I may sell it, but that time is not here yet.
    Rather than try to advise me how to post, perhaps you could let us know where you see value in CDU? Do you wait for it to be proven and moving up again?

    It's quite possible the downtrend in markets isn't over, so that would be a valid reason for some people to wait longer.
    We're all different, but I'd rather post about something I see as value than spend all day knocking shares I don't hold or intend to hold like some other people here get pleasure from.

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  30. Shadow, that is bull dust, and you know it.
    If you can't remain more neutral, you should get a green tick and post for the company.
    You simply can't give a value on it without ALL the information.
    Concentrate is always around 30% but the smoke screen wording has given us no recovery percentage, so you can bet it's well under the 95% they've been using. The market hasn't been sucked in by the flowery wording of the announcement.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  31. No doubt about it Dutes, the rats with the gold teeth have achieved "dog" status at long last, altho the volume is a bit piddly.

    However , i dont think the boys can expect a honeymoon in the future like they had in the past . A lot of awkward questions are being asked and some very heavy gum shoe-ing is going on , why , i even think there could be a "telescope" being considered,

    Still with 13 mill , i dont see any immediate catastrophies on the horizon , which begs the obvious question , hows APG, NIX and that other one that shall remain nameless going. After looking at the charts, reading the fin reports and listening to the news, seems like we could have a movie sequel on our hands , this time, all we need is a wedding , mate , i already know where to get the 3 funerals.

    Cheers

    OI NQ , how they hanging?

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  32. Announcement from ERM has made my day. :)

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  33. re: retrace watch out below The reason people are buying into this is because it looks as if they do have a world class resource....if that is the case this stock is very undervalued at current levels.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  34. tvp
    Maybe this sheds some light on it ............................
    He was suspected of being Bendigo. Maybe the mods worked it out.

    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:27 - 236 reads
    Posted by diatribe
    IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
    Post #529197 - in reply to msg. #529196 - splitview

    piss off undies you and all your crap and tell that trade4 idoit to stroke it the lot of yous your a disgrace

    Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation






    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:29 - 236 reads
    Posted by bigdump
    IP 210.49.xxx.xxx
    Post #529199 - in reply to msg. #529188 - splitview

    so who should be ashamed of themselves
    it squite ironic !
    Isn't talking to ones self a form of madness





    Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation






    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:30 - 246 reads
    Posted by diatribe
    IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
    Post #529201 - in reply to msg. #529199 - splitview

    fark u 2 fool ramper

    Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation






    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:35 - 242 reads
    Posted by trade4profit
    IP 144.139.xxx.xxx
    Post #529204 - in reply to msg. #529197 - splitview

    diatribe...

    Here are the posts you refer to "6 - 8 weeks ago"...

    ---

    Subject copper strike.. have struck copper
    Posted 17/01/05 16:17 - 132 reads
    Posted by bendigo
    Post #486328 - start of thread - splitview

    Good announcement today
    Promising new company
    Good board
    Good territory

    go the ASX website & check out the announcment.

    Cheers
    Bendigo

    ---

    Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
    Posted 17/01/05 16:32 - 112 reads
    Posted by NR
    Post #486342 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview

    all ready on them bendigo......awaiting further annonucements.......


    ---


    Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
    Posted 18/01/05 08:30 - 112 reads
    Posted by Dezneva
    Post #486665 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview

    Yep, I agree. I know the people as well. They have a whole heap of old TEC ground. Its a great hit. and I think they are continuing the drilling.

    ---


    These were the first 3 posts ever on CSE.

    Although Dezneva only posted "...I know the people as well...", I can see how you may have remebered that as "...the boss being a good bloke..."

    Problem is, it was Bendigo he was replying to and not you!

    How do you explain that?

    Cheers!

    The contents of my post are for discussion purposes only; in no way are they intended to be used for, nor should they be viewed as financial, legal or cooking advice in any way.

    Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation






    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:40 - 234 reads
    Posted by Rocker
    IP 220.253.xxx.xxx
    Post #529215 - in reply to msg. #529204 - splitview

    well picked up T4P


    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  35. I get your drift joewolf.
    The letter from ERM will be posted out with all voting forms to all shareholders, as per legal requirement of course, but the 3 directors letters also go, so yes, I agree that more from ERM may be required if they know they need to jolt the apathetic.

    Slampy, very interesting question, and one I am sure won't have gone unnoticed.

    Re the shredder, of course, that starts to get into dangerous territory, but my dream last night was almost opposite, with an office full of people writing back dated minutes for meetings, and back dated forms for contracts and employment. It was a hectic dream, and I hope there's no reality in it at all.


    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  36. iam
    1,149 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 20
    It has been a long time since posting in this forum because of a headache from the head against a brick wall syndrome, caused through the lack of reasonable replies from the ASX, ASIC and Parliamentarians.

    I have added a follow up to this distant thread because Don Randall finally had a reply from David Bradbury after almost 12 months, which he forwarded to me this week.

    Even politicians find it difficult to engage in mature and timely communication.

    Don Randall, MP, originally forwarded my submission 17 May 2010 to the Minister for Financial Services but it ended up with David Bradbury, Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer in his portfolio responsibility for ASIC.

    Don Randall's office offered their apologies in the extreme delay in getting a response from the minister but I assured them it was par for the course with any submissions in relation to the use of algorithmic trading to manipulate the markets.

    The low priority in forwarding a response, and the failure to acknowledge that algorithms can be used in price manipulation, confirms my belief in the lack of understanding and priority in tackling the problem on behalf retail investors who are competing in an uneven playing field when investing/trading in Australian Companies.

    For those interested - here is the response I received:

    'The Hon David Bradbury MP
    Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer

    21 APR 2011

    Dear Mr Randall

    Thank you for your personal representations of 17 May 2010, originally directed to the Minister for Financial Services, Superannuating and Corporate Law on behalf of Mr iam, concerning algorithmic trading and market manipulation on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX). Your letter has been referred to me as I have portfolio responsibility for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). I apologise for the delay in responding to you.

    Mr iam's letter appears to equate algorithmic trading with market manipulation. Algorithmic trading (or automated order processing) is a practice that is widely used on financial markets around the world. Most algorithmic trading is not manipulative. In general, the Government does not seek to impose regulations that would seek to restrict or inhibit legitimate trading behaviour. However, the Government is concerned by any behaviour that seeks to manipulate the market.

    Any deliberate attempts to force a security's price to an artificial level are illegal, irrespective of the method(s) employed. Where this is suspected, the ASIC will investigate the matter. If the activity is determined to constitute market abuse, ASIC will pursue appropriate sanctions under the Corporations Act 2001.

    Reflecting the serious nature of such activity, on 28 January 2010, the Government announced its intention to substantially increase the penalties for market manipulation offences. Following the election, the Government maintained its commitment to this policy, with the commencement of the Corporations Amendment Act (No. 1) 2010 on 24 November 2010.

    These changes included provisions to increase the penalties for individuals to $500,000 or three times the profit made or loss avoided, whichever is greater. For corporations, the penalty is now the greater of $5,000,000, three times the profit made or loss avoided, or 10 per cent of the corporation's annual turnover during the period the breach occurred. In addition, offenders may be imprisoned for up to 10 years.

    Mr iam's letter refers to the ASX report into algorithmic trading and market access arrangements, released in February 2010. I note that the report concluded that algorithmic trading has not had a harmful impact on the market, and that it has not raised any major supervisory or operational issues for the ASX. However, it did identify a number of areas for improvement, including recommendations for ASIC, to ensure that algorithmic trading does not affect market integrity in the future, especially in light of the proposed introduction of market competition. I am confident that ASIC will give full and careful consideration to these recommendations.

    The Government will continue to monitor developments in the area to determine whether any further regulatory changes are needed to ensure the continued integrity of Australia's financial markets.

    On 4 November 2010, ASIC released for consultation a comprehensive package of proposals regarding Australia's equity market structure (available at ASIC's website, www.asic.gov.au). Although primarily for the purpose of introducing market competition, the proposals consider other issues pertinent to the regulatory framework, such as algorithmic trading and the increasing global trend towards automation. ASIC is currently reviewing industry feedback and submissions received from interested parties in response to this consultation package.

    Algorithmic trading is much more prevalent in overseas jurisdictions. Foreign regulators have been grappling with this issue for much longer than Australian regulators, and many are currently reviewing its impact on their markets as well as potential regulatory responses. As is customary with matters of mutual concern, Australia's regulators will continue to communicate with their international counterparts on this issue.

    As you may be aware, early last year the US regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), released a consultation paper on various market issues, including aspects of algorithmic trading (such as high frequency trading, and the quality and fairness of a highly automated, high speed market). I understand that the SEC has received a significant number of submissions to date, and that this consultation process is on-going. I am sure that ASIC will take a keen interest in the outcome of this consultation process.

    Mr iam's letter also suggests a number of recommendations for consideration regarding algorithmic trading and market manipulation. The Government welcomes public input into the legislative reform process and will give due consideration to Mr iam's suggestions. However, I would like to emphasise that algorithmic trading and market manipulation are two separate issues. Algorithmic trading is simply a tool - it is unlikely to be a cause for concern when used for legitimate trading purpose. The Government is continuing to work with regulators and market operators to ensure that appropriate safeguards are in place to detect, punish and, where possible, prevent manipulative activity, to ensure that the stability and integrity of the Australian capital markets are not put at risk.

    Thank you again for writing on behalf of Mr iam and I hope this information will be of assistance to him.

    Yours sincerely

    David Bradbury'


    #:>()
  37. I reckon you should all get a life personally!
    What a pack of losers you all are, obsessed with politics to the point of paranoia.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  38. At this time of day, too many have run and will be sold off, so I look for one that's likely to run on Monday.

    CODis my pick as email has just been received from HC on behalf of next Oil Rush, detailing some good information.

    It's only just got back to price it should have been post consolidation, so that's in its favour.
    Very little to sell, I like that, as it will move quickly.

    Many won't have received the email yet as they're at work, etc.

    Read more here.

    http://www.nextoilrush.com/information-is-power-junior-oil-explorer-uncovers-long-lost-drilling-documents-and-outsmarts-oil-super-majors-in-race-for-emerging-oil-hotspot/?utm_source=HCMO

    Looks good for next week. Be prepared!
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  39. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  40. tvp
    re: it goes like this? Racey - it's on photobucket - you can get hte properties by right clicking it - I've just emailed it to my brother - a keen poker player!

    Salty - howsabout an email update please imo!!
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  41. What a fascinating thread reading back 3 months!

    Lots of reading today!
    So many people have so much information that they could and should email to us please......

    [email protected]

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.