NAN product vs. alternatives

Hi All,

I was doing some research on NAN vs. alternative disinfection to decide whether to buy shares and thought i would share.

• Cheaper than dedicated chemical disinfectant rooms that require machinery, vents, all staff equipment.
• Better audit trail and certainty of consistent disinfectant procedure vs. manual processes such as chemical disinfection.
• Less operational risk for staff when the process is contained within a machine vs. a chemical bath manual process.
• Quicker vs. a lot of other manual/autoclave procedures. (7 mins vs. 20 mins).
• The machine is portable, can wheel it around vs. chemical rooms or an autoclave.
• Autoclave uses hot steam – can impact some sensitive probes.
• HPV doesn’t die sometimes when manual disinfection is used, Trophon kills/inactivates it.

This is why 48/50 of the biggest US hospitals have moved over to Trophon EPR from Nanosonic.