More random thoughts.
AKD1000 is entirely novel architecture protected by patent.
NaNose sensor is entirely novel architecture protected by patent.
What are the odds that AKD1000 used another sensor not NaNose and NaNose used another processor not AKD1000 and both by happen-chance test there uniquely different Covid-19 Devices and both achieve identical performance of 94%.
Perhaps we could ask Peter van der Made to have one of his assistants do the maths and tell us what the odds are.
NANOSE & SNIFFPHONE, page-104
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,391 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BRN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
20.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(2.44%) |
Mkt cap ! $371.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 20.5¢ | 20.5¢ | 19.5¢ | $843.2K | 4.220M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 71948 | 20.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 20.5¢ | 644737 | 16 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BRN (ASX) Chart |