I think the main issue is religious like belief in probability...

  1. 218 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 35
    I think the main issue is religious like belief in probability distributions and the fraudulent ways politicians and others use them to push their agenda. like recently Australia the lefties Greens/Labor calling a normal occurrence of floods "the climate floods", using a disaster to manipulate people to further their agenda of control. Its easy to find several high ranking professors writing articles explaining what a "1 in 100 year flood" means, the current modelling/probability distributions accounts for these events, its not out of the ordinary. But it definitely creates fear when you say we had 3 "1 in 100" in 4 years, its the climate floods.
    Same with a bleaching events in the GBR, used by governments to push control over farmers, mining etc. When in fact its just a natural occurrence. One prominent scientist who was fired for disagreeing with the agenda, has now been vindicated with the latest AIMS report showing the most coral cover since recording began. Its easy for a certain greens MP to say "4 degrees above average", "the reef is dead", this 4 degrees above average sounds scary to people, but once again its nothing the probability distribution doesnt account for.
    Even in this video Gore says "it could be as little as 7 years", he is doing the same thing, deliberate or not.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.