- The AGW hoax with planned draconian UN control and destructive cash-strip-mining carbon dioxide taxes
- the orchestrated and facilitated massive invasion of islamofacist colonists,
- the forced reversion to primitive tribalism renamed as "multiculturalism",
- the dismantling of our energy supply systems and replacements of unreliable weather dependent PV and 15th century wind power supplies,
- the bans on new dam building to ensure that our water supplies remain constained nd restricted despite the massive forced increase in our population
Dont see a trend?
The destructive leftie/greenie and their like-minded corruptocrat comrades at the UN are ensuring the devolution of the western industrial world and a forced reversion to serfdom with our UN overlords and their leftie/greenie partners in crime living in glorious luxury while the rest of us deal the the artificially created shortages of water, energy, food, etc., etc.,
Maurice Strong seems to be a key former UN figure behind the AGX hoax...
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Maurice_Strong
- Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class - involving high meat intake, the use of fossil fuels, electrical appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing - are not sustainable.
- If we don't change, our species will not survive... Frankly, we may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrial civilization to collapse.
- Maurice Strong, September 1, 1997 edition of National Review magazine
- What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group's conclusion is 'no'. The rich countries won't do it. They won't change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?
- Maurice Strong, Interview 1992, concerning the plot of a book he would like to write[1]
- It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation-states, however powerful. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the imperatives of global environmental cooperation.
- "Our concepts of ballot-box democracy may need to be modified to produce strong governments capable of making difficult decisions." [2]
