he's not published in a journal. he's published in a journalistic website.
and his "facts" contradict what I have read from published research in scientific journals.
I dismiss this not for the conclusions it finds, but because
a) it is not published in any reputable science or scholarly journal, and
b) it is inconsistent with research that is
So, yes, he's made is methods and available, but he has shot his mouth off before it is reviewed.
I would be quite happy if climate change were proven wrong. But in over a decade all I have found are denial claims that prove to be wrong.
