I simply make the point that the pure volume of science directly from the source- being ALL the top scientists in the field renders a clipping from a 1972 small newspaper fairly impotent. Why is one line without context from a 1972 tiny newspaper to be taken over the current opinions of NASA? Because it is all a con and a hoax and a communist conspiracy.... sorry I forgot. This is what NASA thinks in 2019:
https://climate.nasa.gov/
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- NASA KNEW!
I simply make the point that the pure volume of science directly...
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
AGC
AUSTRALIAN GOLD AND COPPER LTD
Glen Diemar, MD
Glen Diemar
MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online