it is in context when read with the whole editorial. What is shown is but a portion. And yes it is underneath the Womens business.
The emissions comment has been one that has been discussed by many scientists.
I do stand to be corrected but Einstein made comment on molecules and absorption and emissions that are along similar lines (that is purely my recollection)
I am sure that the science editor of the day would not be making up quotes from NASA on absorption and emissions.
I have "snipped" the relevant section from the editorial. I have no problem in showing the whoole article. I have nothing to hide. Just wanted to make sure that the heller info is correct. I vet my info as well. Unlike others who just throw mud at anything they do not like!
