Hi mate
It kinda makes my point. In Coronary Artery occlusion (post MI) the LVAD is used as the muscle is irreversibly destroyed - transplant is the only other option, and a CABG is pointless as the damage is already done.
The second part seems to refer to 'functional heart tissue' - ie CCF patients. Not dead but not working properly - and yes this is what Revascor is to be used for isn't it?
I think we are agreeing here - but note - post LVAD implantation in Coronary Artery disease and MI - there is nothing that can be done. You can't restore dead muscle. it stays dead for ever. Hence the trasplant.
Post LVAD in CCF - yes, that's where Revascor comes in.
NASDAQ hot!!!, page-661
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add MSB (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
95.0¢ |
Change
-0.015(1.55%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.084B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 96.5¢ | 96.5¢ | 94.5¢ | $2.433M | 2.552M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 72431 | 94.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 95.0¢ | 20225 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 27/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MSB (ASX) Chart |