nasdaq is overdue and an explanation is reqd, page-3

Agree Beechmere,

Martin Rogers felt confident enough to mention a time frame of 60-90 days initially. Now we're being told not to mention it for fear of jeopardising it? I certainly didn't put forward the 60-90 day time frame, he did.

Now as you say 16 months (actually probably closer to 17/18 months) we've heard nothing about this.

I'm sure this will draw the ire of the $1 party faithful who will continue to tell you its a mere formality and that the boxes are being ticked.

Regardless I didn't announce plans to list, nor the timeframe. I hold but I agree its time to ask questions and not be merely flogged off with a 'please dont ask you might jinx it'.

As a shareholder I have every right to be kept informed. ESPECIALLY when expectations are not met and delays occur.