EXT excite technology services ltd

nash equilibria

  1. 4,582 Posts.
    Released yesterday from WH Ireland.......


    The Inevitable Embrace of the Nash Equilibria


    A Nash equilibrium is a term to describe a set of strategies, one for each player, in a
    scenario such that no player has the incentive to act unilaterally. In a sense players are
    in equilibrium, in that if any of the participants changed their strategy, it would leave that
    particular player to earn less. The end result is that there is an incentive to remain with
    his current strategy. In this particular game, there are three obvious players.


    · Rio Tinto obviously has an appetite to acquire the Rossing South asset, but only if
    the price is right (we estimate between 121p and 204p ps). Given the recent Alcan
    fright, we believe that they are unlikely to purchase this deposit via a public takeover.
    According to our calculations, Rio effectively controls 19.5% of EXT, meaning
    they already retain the right to automatic block another major acquiring the asset in
    its entirety. We should also point out obvious, that Rio would have already gone
    through a series of “game scenarios” at a far greater level of sophistication and peer
    review than that attempted here. Consequently, they would have formulated a
    strategy that would be likely, under most circumstances, to maximise their objectives.
    ·

    Polo Resources is probably best described as a selective resource based fund, with
    uranium and coal interests in Africa, Australia and Asia. Key personnel include
    Stephen Dattels and Neil Herbert, to-date have been best known for their
    entrepreneurial sale of Uramin to Areva for US$2.7Bn, at the height of the uranium
    boom in 2007. Since then they have had an eye for opportunity, making a number of
    judicious investments. We note, however, that they have remained professionally
    dispassionate, not falling in love with any particular stock, as witnessed in the sale of
    their stake in Berkeley Resources, and, more recently, A-Cap Resources and Impact
    Minerals. We have no doubt that if they determined that there was little additional
    capital growth at Rossing South, coupled with an opportunity to sell their holding,
    they would do so in a heart-beat.


    · Unlike Polo, KAH’s key asset is Rossing South. At this juncture, we believe that the
    company has a bifurcated strategy. It, like Polo, would be a willing seller of Rossing
    South if it thought the price sufficient. If no offer eventuates, then the company
    would be willing to develop the deposit (although we suspect that no such wish exists
    within Polo). In evidence of KAH’s current intensions, we would point out that under
    ASX creep provisions (ASX rule 6.11, item 9), the company has had the opportunity
    to increase its holdings in EXT via on-market purchases every six months, once the
    company had crossed the 19.9% mandatory takeover threshold. To-date, the
    company has steadfastly refused this option. The cost benefit of this strategy,
    however, is probably long-gone. At current prices it would require KAH to undertake
    a capital raising of approximately in-excess of £30m (or A$70m) every six months to
    realise this opportunity. To determine future intent, we will continue to closely
    examine EXT’s announcements regarding appointments of operational personnel. If
    EXT continually engages contractors to cover technical, we would interpret this as a
    “Sell” intention from the company.

    Rio Tinto would love to have this asset
    Polo wants to Sell the asset
    KAH is confused


    The Plural of Spouse is Spice – Rio & China Anyone?


    Game Theory does have some obvious short-comings, in areas of imperfect knowledge,
    irrational behaviour and potentially Black Swan events (hard to predict, rare events
    outside the normal realms of expectation). Despite this, outcome can be predicted
    solving a “finite extensive form game” (also known as a game tree) via the process of
    “backward induction”. The theory dictates that if one determines the optimal strategy of
    the player who makes the last move of the game, then the optimal action of the next-tolast
    moving player can also be predicted, and so on until all the players’ activities have
    been determined. Our belief now is that Rio Tinto or as yet an unknown third party will be
    the last mover.


    · We don’t believe that either KAH or Polo Resources will ultimately be the long-term
    operators of Rossing South.


    · For the reasons outlined previously, we don’t believe that Rio Tinto will be a buyer of
    EXT/KAH on market. They are in a very strong position, being a price maker rather
    than taker. Given that we do not expect Rio to increase its position materially, we
    are also convinced that it’s not in Rio’s best interest to reduce its holding either.


    · We also do not believe that this project will be a toll-treatment operation. Although
    this option effectively has no upfront plant capex (which is substantial), or in most
    cases incur metallurgical or processing costs. Transportation costs would naturally
    be higher, and the miner would still incur extraction costs. At the end of the day, a
    toll-treatment option would mean that profits would be shared on some proscriptive
    joint basis. This outcome would be an unsatisfactory outcome for all parties.


    · Therefore, we think it highly likely, evaluating various scenario analysis, that there is
    likely an additional player that has yet to show its hand. We hypothesis that this
    player would likely be vertically integrated, with an over-riding requirement to secure
    supply for a number of nuclear power plants.


    The only other group other than Areva
    (who incidentally has financial issues associated with its purchase and the
    development of its Uramin asset) is China. China has notionally unlimited funds and
    is still running surpluses, albeit substantially smaller level than they were several
    years ago. The country also has the added impetus of wanting not to add to its
    holdings in US dollars, increasing its air quality of its cities, and potentially lessening
    its reliance of the petroleum based economy. Either via electrification of its
    transportation system, through electric or hybrid cars, or the adoption of a hydrogenbased
    economy.

    If such a move were to occur, we would think it highly likely inside
    the next 6 to 12 months.


    http://www.minesite.com/fileadmin/content/pdfs/Brokers_Notes_August_09/Brokers_Notes_Sept_09/Brokers_Notes_Oct_09/Brokers_Notes_Nov_09/WHI-Kalahari-171109.pdf




    Cheers all!

 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
1.0¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! $20.72M
Open High Low Value Volume
0.9¢ 1.0¢ 0.9¢ $47.68K 5.278M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
1 400000 0.9¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
1.0¢ 6370837 8
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 25/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
EXT (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.