Quick question on this for the market experts out there: if Opes was truly the "beneficial owner" of the stock (and not Opes clients), was Opes required to lodge a substantial shareholder notice if it held more than 5%.
Put another way, if Opes failed to lodge a substantial shareholder notice, could that impact on its right to give ANZ / Merril Lynch security?
- Forums
- ASX - General
- nasty turn for anz
Quick question on this for the market experts out there: if Opes...
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online