native copper page 9 of jorc report, page-50

The question is now how were the reverse cycle drilling results treated if the adjacent diamond drill results gave consisently higher results as reported by the company. 5:1 lower Cu results in the Jorc due to drilling type + nugget effect might mean grades are significanly higher if you consider analysis of DD reults to be more represenative. Say diamond drill assay results were consistently higher by a factor of 2 or more as reported by the company which seems possible and Jorc may be a lot higher?