Another backwards calculation. Purple is design 6000 T a year. which should have lower revenue and profit than Next which is 7200 T a year. Yet you show Design with a lower PE which is the opposite of what would happen. Great Chart! I cannot believe how many people upvoted it and gave you a Great Analysis.
Please explain how higher profits left hand side can result in a higher PE. Does it make any sense to you at all? Earnings go up PE goes down.
Another backwards calculation. Purple is design 6000 T a year....
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2,040 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add LYC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$6.92 |
Change
-0.140(1.98%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.468B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $6.94 | $6.97 | $6.84 | $15.53M | 2.248M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 13835 | $6.90 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $6.93 | 2500 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 02/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LYC (ASX) Chart |