It will be at least 3 Qs before revenues turn positive more...

It will be at least 3 Qs before revenues turn positive more likely 5 or 6. At that Rate we are looking at over a year before any major uptick in stock price. JMO stok will fall with Q4, Q1, Q2 and SAR. There will be short spurts up but overall, direction will be down. I look at price a week or two after event because AL is a great salesperson, and it usually goes up with announcement. I usually update this chart only once a month, but I did it for you. Look at a chart Of Lynas SP pick a number you like in last 18 months then to compensate for book to Bill delay look 90 days before to see What NdPrO price was. figure out for yourself what has to happen. Then you will know when it might get there. Because of Book to bill delay Q1 2024 will see worse revenue of several years no matter what price does now! it is already set. Curren price changes only impact Q2.

I guess you have your choice listen to MIKAJ or UBS, UBS latest AnalisisPost #:68292168. Now Historically UBS has always been high But adjusts down as date approaches so only a little high at info release. I think they over compensated this time with 2024 earning only be $44 M. Even if EPS comes in at $100 Wthith a Pe of 12, Higher than to day that is a SP of 100M/900M = 0.11 X12 = SP 1.21. Now i do not think Lynas SP will ever go this low but to think it will be up from now after 2024 AR is probably wrong. Yes many people said UBS was crazy when their numbers came out. Not one up ramper showed they were wrong using real data. Not one said because with a logical explanation of what caused it except evil intent. They have always been super positive on Lynas.

Now i encourage you to study MikaJ record. Search results for: * - HotCopper | ASX Share Prices, Stock Market & Share Trading Forum He is always high and occasionally by 2 or 3 to 1. Since he is always positive no one ever looks back and checks his accuracy. Have you ever checked? So typical of up rampers someone post a positive and every body uses it with absolutly no checking. Then everybody says it has to be true look at how many people say it.

So typical of you and all the up rampers. Not one word on why the statement was wrong. Just a comment on how they want to "RAPE" People. Do you really think a wind company with no traditional energy assets would shut down a profitable project just to hurt people? PLS explain why.

Did you even look at their web site to see what they are about. JMO but answer is a BIG NO. Here is web site Fossil freedom - Vattenfall Now pls take a look and justify your "RAPE" comment. I know you cannot so I doubt you will reply.