NEA chart, page-258

SA1588, I didn't think I Was being over negative. I will try to be more circumspect if that is how comes across.

I see NEA as having good kit, software and hardware, as Stuart Nixon is renown for. However NEA seems to badly run, both as a place of innovation and of marketing. I think this has been systemic for quite awhile. NEA is certainly not meeting its full potential, and in suspect this is due to poor executives over the years. I think they need to review the quality of their upper management, and get true professionals who have more germane experience and knowledge, and a better understanding of the science of innovation, not just buzz wording names.

Does anyone know why Nixon left so many years ago?