There's been a bit of discussion around the balance sheet and potential need for a capital raising.
The dip in cash in H1FY18 of $7.7m consisted of:
* $4.1m in increased opex/investments
* $2.1m of non-recurring costs (office fitout) of which $1.2m has been rebated in January
* $1.5m in timing of receivables vs payables
Guidance is for ACV to increase by the same as H1, therefore H2 ACV should roughly increase by $8m (barring exchange fluctuations).
Given that Nearmap's contracts are paid annually in advance, this should mean that we're back into cashflow positive territory in H2 barring unforeseen increases in expenditure/investments, and no current plans to expand into new territories.
Am I missing something in the above or are we quite comfortable growing within AU and US without further capital?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NEA going gangbusters
There's been a bit of discussion around the balance sheet and...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 23 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
LU7
Discover the strong preliminary feasibility of the Bécancour Lithium Refinery, showcasing resilience in a low pricing environment and a strategic plan to capitalize on future price recoveries