I wasn't calling out the article regarding the spelling or grammar. The article is based on the presumption that the Murray report has put 'enough' pressure on the government. Which is excessively subjective. The government's only reaction was a statement that it will consult with stakeholders. Which is quite laughable really as those who don't benefit from any policy change will be consulted. I think I know what parties have enough clout to put 'enough' pressure on the government to leave negative gearing unchanged seeing we've been through all this before.
- Forums
- Property
- Neg gearing - Gone?
Neg gearing - Gone?, page-206
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 85 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online