Neg gearing - Gone?, page-206

I wasn't calling out the article regarding the spelling or grammar. The article is based on the presumption that the Murray report has put 'enough' pressure on the government. Which is excessively subjective. The government's only reaction was a statement that it will consult with stakeholders. Which is quite laughable really as those who don't benefit from any policy change will be consulted. I think I know what parties have enough clout to put 'enough' pressure on the government to leave negative gearing unchanged seeing we've been through all this before.