ok, so if you were to ignore his writing style, what part of his...

ok, so if you were to ignore his writing style, what part of his QUANTITATIVE analysis is poorly done?

or, what is it about his quantitative analysis that makes it a poor article? .... surely, if we're talking about negative gearing we should care less about style and care far more about substance right?

therefore, don't worry about his qualitative style (just ignore it if you can), I want you to describe the flaws in his quantitative analysis.

I mean - this issue is important right? .... negative gearing is a serious issue .... this guy has spent time gathering data, presenting it in a simple way and providing a quantitative argument

don't you think it's lazy to just say, "oh, very poor article, C+"

where is the flaw in his quantitative argument?