so, what you're saying is an abundance of affordable rental properties isn't a positive for society? you'd rather see people living on the street, unable to pay rent and have a roof over their head... just so that those providing that housing don't get rewarded for it?
i'm sorry. i thought modern society economics worked by people providing a good/service, and then getting paid for it. my mistake. remove negative gearing. lets see what happens to rent/homelessness . i don't really mind. no burden on me.
- Forums
- Property
- Neg gearing - Gone?
so, what you're saying is an abundance of affordable rental...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 61 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)