Here is an old article that only serves to confuse me. I thought Keating reversed the decision to limit offsetting rental losses to other rental income because rental properties had declined in availability - but this article challenges that.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/08/24/1061663676588.html
- Forums
- Property
- Neg gearing - Gone?
Neg gearing - Gone?, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 285 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)