stillfoxhat
While the reason on the basis of fairness and equity are valid in relation to indexing
these terms have absolutley no relevance to tax law
Simple fact is the same reason for indexing of carried forward tax losses on rental properties could equally be as valid for all carried forward tax losses.
However reality has it that there are no provisions to increase any carried foraward tax loss through indexation.
It is not uncommon for some companies to carry forward tax losses for 10+ years, which means by the time they get to utilise the loss the dollar value of the loss has been greatly reduced. This is also exactly what currently applies under non-commercial loss provisions of the tax act.
Therefore I would hold very little hope that somehow they would allow indexing of losses they made investors carried forward on rental properties
- Forums
- Property
- negative gearing and property
stillfoxhatWhile the reason on the basis of fairness and equity...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
TG1
TechGen Metals kicks off airborne geophys survey at Sally Downs copper play – a first for the permit
STX
Strike hands $48.5M contract to Clarke Energy to produce 20x 4.5MW gas engines for Sth Erregulla
MND
Albemarle lithium downsize burns $200M hole in Monadelphous's pocket as latter's contracts terminated
Featured News
KAI
Pilbara Minerals buys land off Kairos part of its York gold project for $20M – and a 2% royalty on any PLS gold sales
GML
Gateway Mining sells WA Eastern Montague gold project to Brightstar for $14M – half of that in shares