The original ann stated MUST have 60% and min 200mt for jv to...

The original ann stated MUST have 60% and min 200mt for jv to continue. My assumption is that has occurred. NSL had to spend $$$ to further the contract.

This is where I lose fact from faith. I cannot seem to find proof that NSL raised and provided 10m(?) to obtain land or land rights.

That being said, I have to wonder if the merger denounces the original jv conditions then. I say this because no samples have been published as promised. And promised is the correct term to use. These results where due two (+) months ago.

To simplify a "nervous view" of mine, pessimistic views fuel my thought for loss of finacial interest in NSL. At least downrampers make me feel like laughing because they think have missed out. Why else post neg statements other than try to get we NSL holders are. lol

It's like these "down ramping" posters are trying to save us a few bucks and tell us that it's all a scam. Downrampers are angels! lol