"Saying it twice doesn’t make it true." That's right , it doesn't. But the article, which I doubt you read, actually provides reasoning to support the statement I made.
And you saying "whereas they are more likely designed to prevent new wars in the region." doesn't sound at all convincing. 'more likely' doesn't sound like even you are particularly convinced yourself. Let alone your complete lack of substantiation.
The original source of US aggression in the ME and Central Asia (over 30 years) hasn't gone away it has only increased . Not to mention that Trump could provoke a war with Iran as a way to declare some sort of "martial law" to stay in power.
