The problem Lockitt is in defining "something". My point is that all the "somethings" left on the table like asset sales, M&A, more financing etc. are all bad for shareholders. There is simply no choice left for the Company that doesn't involve the size of the asset backing per share getting significantly smaller for existing shareholders. I've explained my reasoning in the past.
But you might get a bounce.
The problem Lockitt is in defining "something". My point is that...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)