Thanks for the poster Twin. Just wanted to pop in and mention...

Thanks for the poster Twin. Just wanted to pop in and mention that I feel like Anteo are underselling the technology in this direct comparison to EDC chemistry. Researchers will understand immediately, but investors may not. Researchers can perform the first 3 steps of M&G activation in a big batch, and will only really need to perform the 20-60 min, final 3 steps of the process for binding the protein or antibody to the bead. This is not possible with EDC chemistry.

To put things into context, for a routine experiment it takes us 2-4 hour to couple proteins onto a non-bead based platform using EDC s-NHS coupling chemistry. Alternatively, we have a years worth of M&G activated slides that were made in an hour, and only require a <15 min, 1 or 2 step protein coupling protocol. Big difference. Faster, cheaper, stably pre-activated, less toxic reagents, simpler, more reproducible and more universal in binding nature. Curious to see how long it is going to take for their technology to become an every-day tool in the hands of most researchers globally. All IMO.