You're welcome to disagree, but there is no denying those things have occured after he came onboard and those are factual points. Look at the timeline. If it was others, why has it taken 5+ years for changes to be made? Where is the justification for the actions of the board over the last 5+ years? Would you not agree changes are being made for the better? Who would you give credit to? Someone or some people are responsible, who are they?
