Bourbasted.
What a hypocrite!!! In one breath you criticise a poster for giving Studley the credit for exiting Diasource and in the next breath you assert that Studley may have been responsible/involved with the sacking of staff who are now employed by former collaborators.
No evidence has been provided to establish the credibility of either claim. However, you can't have it both ways. It's like saying, at the toss of a coin, heads I win, tails you lose.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
