So why did SPARK ask NAG to quote for taking and storing PASS?
Metro rail - given the much smaller quantities - processed its PASS on site
Transurban had very little PASS but got their bums smacked for not disposing the PFAS as per EPA guidelines - cost billions for not doing it right the first trime
The NEL has 7 million tonnes of PASS to dispose of in 2 years - that's almost 300,000 tonnes a month or 67,000 tonnes a week or just over 13,000 every work day or about 10,000 tonnes every week day.
Tell me which other site can lime treat 10,000 to 13,000 tonnes of PASS daily. (and in bad weather)
To make it easy for you - that's about 250 trucks a day
So why did SPARK ask NAG to quote for taking and storing...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NAG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.762M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 254067 | 1.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2¢ | 781750 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 11/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NAG (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable