New Director nominations, page-8

Suggestions of letting the process run until "the end of the quarter" is showing the apathy traits of exactly what you have accused shareholders of having when not being proactive and casting votes at meetings.

Shareholders either nominating themselves or being nominated, and if by some chance they were successful would basically circumnavigate any need for a s249D, wouldn't it?

Directors that were put in by shareholders would be more aligned to the best interests of all shareholders, surely?

As you say, test the waters by nominating directors to be put up for election, would also send a message to the current board?

Do you actually trust the current board, given their performance sine the trading halt?

What day, given that an outcome presented by the board, bearing in mind that it will be a fate accompli subject to conditions precedent as in: shareholder approval?

Does the company have to actually get shareholder approval for any deal that Treadstone and themselves put together?

I mean they didn't get approval when they cease funding Morila?

Just saying

Also if nominated directors do not get elected, that also will decide shareholders fate in being left in the hands of the current board as any further shareholder action via a s249D would certainly also fail?

cheers

Timing is everything. .......