re: new doubts on wtc collapse/grant62 No brittle brain the article says that moderate heat, not intense heat, was a major factor.
The article actually gives a good description of how and why that is so, and it accords with known physics.
The stuff you are posting has no basis in science and is nothing more than hearsay about alleged cover-ups.
You just can't accept being proven wrong can you ?
Dave R.
- Forums
- General
- new doubts on wtc collapse
new doubts on wtc collapse, page-154
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 41 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug
SKS
SKS Technologies wins US$90M award to supply power to international hyperscale data centre in Melbourne