new doubts on wtc collapse, page-184

re: statist new doubts on wtc collapse/grant62 statist, are you sure it wasn't Santa Claus that made the towers collapse? USA is, after all, very naughty.

Since you think Popular Mechanics and their 300+ strong panel of experts are all phony loonies then here are quite a few links you can read as your bedtime stories. Enjoy

http://ourworld-top.cs.com/mikegriffith1/refute.htm

To get you started on your quest for enlightenment here is a piece from on of these links. Enjoy child


-------------
Not good enough: Such a plot -- to execute the simultaneous destruction of the two towers, a piece of the Pentagon, and four airplanes and make it appear as if it all was done by another party -- is far beyond the skill level of U.S. intelligence. It would require dozens (or scores or hundreds) of individuals to attempt such a scheme. They would have to work together, and trust one another not to blow their part or reveal the conspiracy. They would hail from an assortment of agencies (CIA, FBI, INS, Customs, State, FAA, NTSB, DOD, etc.).

Yet anyone with the most basic understanding of how government functions (or does not function) realizes that the various bureaucracies of Washington -- particularly those of the national security "community" -- do not work well together. Even covering up advance knowledge would require an extensive plot. If there truly had been intelligence reports predicting the 9/11 attacks, these reports would have circulated through intelligence and policymaking circles before the folks at the top decided to smother them for geopolitical gain. That would make for a unwieldy conspiracy of silence. And in either scenario -- planning the attacks or permitting them to occur -- everyone who participated in the conspiracy would have to be freakin' sure that all the other plotters would stay quiet.