new doubts on wtc collapse, page-96

Aflatoon,

Several points from your post that I do not quite understand:

1.
"Remember Lockerbie .... They kept the evidence till todate, 40-years."

Given that Lackerbie occurred in 1988, where did you get the 40 years from? It doesn't even equate with any of the normal rules of secrecy - 30 years, 50 years, 100 years, etc.

2.
"But for the WTC it became a hush-hush job."

How did you determine this?

3.
"Americans also do not want to release terrorists from the prison because they are key to the whole truth.
Same can be said of JFK assassination."

So, obviously you agree with the views that the JFK assassination was a cover-up and that the assassins were actually elements of - the US Government; the FBI; the Mafia; the Russians; Castro; etc?

4.
"We are led to believe what they want to."

So, what is the truth out there? Nowhere and noone can actually portray the truth - except for various ananymous internet newsletter sites.

5.
"The fact still I do not understand is how these terrorists escaped securities from the 4 different airports at the same time, took control of the planes and drove them off to WTC."

They came from different departure points. They were acting non-descript. They had a plan. They were a few of more than 200,000 travellers scheduled to take to the air that day. Security wasn't looking for an attack.

Imagine being at a crowded MCG for an AFL Grand Final - 100,000 people there but unless already known, most are unlikely to be recognised until either after the event, or until after something has occurred and the pieces of evidence have all been brought together.

Obviously, you have never been lost in a crowd.