Not sure what your problem is, but you seem to be afraid to acknowledge any genuine criticism of Animoca. My post had nothing to do with instos.
I'll repeat the point that good companies keep shareholders informed. This has nothing to do with your ramblings about instos getting insider info. Of course it happens, there are plenty of leaky ships, but this has nothing to do with Animoca keeping shareholders informed.
Many of us would be delighted if we found out info from Animoca 2 weeks after the instos. Animoca have still not told us retail holders what their revenue was for the last financial year. Seeing financials and audited accounts is not my "ideal scenario", it is the norm. It is such standard practice that it's crazy that some holders will conjure up elaborate excuses as to why Animoca are unable to perform some basic duties.
It is naive to simply accept that Animoca must be an amazing company because some instos chipped in funds. You talk like instos are all good investment managers, whereas the majority underperform. They have placed a calculated bet. If it doesn't work out, it'll be no big deal. Not sure the same applies to you, the way you are acting.
Mentioning Animoca being a likely take out target for FB/Tencent is laughable. What is this "innovation" that such companies would wish to acquire?
New Finance Director - - AB1 re-listing groundwork starting?, page-44
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?