yes, thank you Brad, I too would have preferred that BB remain...

yes, thank you Brad, I too would have preferred that BB remain with a more transitional departure.
kind of like the way PLS have brought in their new CEO.
but No, we have to rush this BS along and why the rush exactly?

so sorry, cannot say I am thrilled or even happy with this rapid type of move so I have taken some off the table and will decide next week if I want to be part of the entitlement, as there is NOTHING here to me that makes this decision method of implementation any better.

because you know why? its not so much what has been done, but it is the way it has been done.
unprofessional, induced by emotion, unclear to shareholders and lack of exact what new tatics or plans yet known to shareholders but still the pay packets are the same.

I also think this new setup is too fast, too unexpected without any due diligence done on a replacement being fully thought out, so why is it that such position was not advertised so we could get then choose?

we now also see a new 52 week low has been created which imo, does also not pan well technically so to me this is not moving forward, its moving sideways with currently less information, but yet it is what it is.

so under the circumstances, I want to see results and I want to see them soon!
and should this sink anymore, than believe it or not, the whole Aus G sector will sink accordingly regardless of how many others out there talk BS about how good their companies are!

see ya later fella's!