@Treba They did a Rear Window where he was mentioned low in the article as an example about two weeks ago, and he literally posted a link to the article. Just because he criticised it doesn't mean he didn't give it oxygen.
As i said, he just needs to stop drawing attention to the furore of the past few years. He's the CEO of a company who SHOULD be doing a listing on a new exchange. There is literally nothing for us to gain by him drawing attention to the controversy of the last 3 years.
Of course they contacted him, he likes the attention and they get to write about it. If he is contacted by AFR, he should either respond with a polite "no comment" or get some junior who won't attract attention to respond. On the JuicyFields stuff, he could've simply said "I can't respond due to privacy considerations" and been done with it. Instead, he'll be in the papers again with a negative slant. This does not help us.
Anyway, I wasnt trying to be critical. I want him to get us on an exchange so we can trade again. The higher the price, the better. All I was saying was that the JuicyFields stuff, on first glance (which is all I've given it) looks like a non-issue. As someone who has been critical of him, I was literally saying that linking the two sounded more like a media beatup. Of course, I cant even do that without getting criticised.
SP1 Price at posting:
$1.07 Sentiment: Sell Disclosure: Held
