It's bordering on comical that some holders think PLV shareholders can vote against the board's recommendation and it not have a significant adverse impact on the company's ability to raise finance over the coming years. It's 2012, not 2007, money isn't being thrown at junior miners like it was back then!
Tony's not a mug. I'm confident he wouldn't have agreed to a deal if there was a better one out there. After all, the company was suspended for 2 or so months. I'm sure he would have waited longer if he was confident of a better deal coming along.
It's bordering on comical that some holders think PLV...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 34 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)