re: new proxy forms pacey
Voting 'No' from my end as well.... I would envisage Tullow need to change terms of SOA to successfully gain control of Hardman. If I have held HDR for this long... I think I can hold out for much much longer.
It appears from reading posts from long-term HDR shareholders that there is a bias towards a "No' vote. I also think they are pretty much in the same boat as I am - long term shareholders that want to extract the maximum value from their shareholding - and clearly, Tullow's bid does not cut the mustard!
My view - don't want to give away this company cheap to some UK E&P firm just because they think it fits their growth strategy - I say bump up terms of SOA or move on.... we are being played by HDR mgmt and we have clearly not been adequately looked after by the board!
Cheers Freakme
HDR
hardman resources limited
re: new proxy forms pacey Voting 'No' from my end as well.... I...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 17 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)