1) "No need to attack each other..."2) "...or measure our...

1) "No need to attack each other..."

2) "...or measure our attributes,"

First of all, I implore that such accusation 1) be substantiated.

Second, we get a lot through here with questionable "attributes" and your directive counselling us against assessment 2), is starting to sound like coming from those who actually require such.

Almost everyone here can select a dud stock to use as an example of why a philosophy doesn't apply.






If you hold or have held that example then tough - remember the GFC in 2008? Most here do.

This a public forum for information interchange, not a crèche or therapy.

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck..... goodbye.