Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

NET netlinkz limited

0.00%

0.3¢

I think you must enjoy being cryptic."But I was asked to help, I...

First 10 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
mikesheen

955 Posts.

296

09/11/22

13:41

Post #: 64671367
Share

Originally posted by jcallaway: ↑

Sorry for not being clear.

Appreciate HC giving the Oxygen.

NET is a Venture company, that should never have gone public.

I treat it like what it is, a start up, in a constant scramble to find it's way. Nothing they do, or try, is unusual, the anomaly is the allowed dilution, and continued public status.

But I was asked to help, I believe JT is actually a square shooter.

For those of us actually in the Technology business, actually long term investors in the Technology business, which is why JT sought me out, people that exist in the largest Cyber product in the world, the US Cyber products market, and someone who routinely interacts with the three largest distributors of all ten..... top Cyber Vendors....... daily, that means not who is talking about it, but who is "SELLING" products, booking real revenue, disclosed by these US public companies quarterly, someone who does this daily, I thought the article useful.

The Cyber market is still, largely, and completely, unserved with a solution that works. That is what it said.

No U.S. company or .Gov\.mil Institution, is standing up and saying, I never get breached because I have this vendor.

Not a one, this does not cover the internal tech used by the IC, not interested in those discussion on a stock forum.

Read the article, and think as potential Investors, why does not every Cyber Product customer not say, 'I want full protection", I do not want to be breached night and day...... think about the freaking D and O policy business at the top level, what do you think they tell their Cyber Carrier when they ask for money, OOPPS, the Cyber Insurance Carrier comes right back and says "Forensically, you dumb ass, you left the door wide open, no wonder you were breached".

The IT department then tells the Board, we can not protect, and we do not know how to stop, these Nation State sponsored, and funded, Cyber attacks.

Because they are embedded, again something I spoke of, and have the receipts to back up, in emails with Tim, Hayden, and of course JT.

The actual industry, has known of this open secret, and just winked at it for a very long time.

That is now over. Sorry you did not like the messenger, Kim, the message was timely for every Cyber company out there.

This article, I thought the local flavor would help the digestion of the premise, KIM and Assange did not ask to be the focal point of most of all this secret disclosure by the way, the article describes an open horizon for a new solution, the article correctly says, in The Surveillance State\Universe, perpetrated by Governments, has back doors everywhere, we are going to have to find another way.

Thus, NET is still in the game. Improbable. Tim got that award in 2011, because it was very clever, the Surveillance State often does not like clever.

Is that clear enough, not that NET wins or even can even survive, but all these huge vendors are either going to have to disclose they were complicit with the State, at least Huawei is open about it, or US lawsuits are going to bring it all down.

The .Mil has a report that says that every weapon system, and operational piece of Silicon is either already, or can be compromised, every ship, every plane.

Thus everything must be replaced.

Network traffic Deep Packet Inspection, Digital Currency, Social Credit Systems, Authenticated Trans National ID, these are the subjects being most talked about.

To say your are the vendor, with Mercantilist China as your primary market, that will defenestrate these evolutions, is either bold or absurd. This has been discussed Ad Nauseum on this forum.

Why can't the customers so in need recognize this technology gem, why does not one of the big boys, Fortinet or Cisco sweep in and say Eureka. Why did Telstra ignore it, they could have had the slickest network since.....well.....NBN...with this Element installed.

All I said, under my real name from the jump, it is just too small a part of a system, to lever by itself.

The new BOD and COO, the SSI and now Hosting Acquisitions, the new website all positives. And I said so at the time.

My position is clear, did not ask for you to like it.

The market is still looking for a solution.

Expand

I think you must enjoy being cryptic.

"But I was asked to help, I believe JT is actually a square shooter."

How? By whom? I'm having to read between the lines here and assume you mean JT, as in James Tsiolis the CEO of NetLinkz, asked you to provide funding.

"For those of us actually in the Technology business, actually long term investors in the Technology business, which is why JT sought me out"

How are you in the Technology business, besides investing?

"...and we do not know how to stop, these Nation State sponsored, and funded, Cyber attacks.

Because they are embedded, again something I spoke of, and have the receipts to back up, in emails with Tim, Hayden, and of course JT."

Receipts and emails of what? Paying state nation sponsored bad actors? Are you saying NetLinkz has paid state sponsored hackers and there is evidence of this and you have seen it and know where it is? See what being cutesy cryptic does?

"The actual industry, has known of this open secret, and just winked at it for a very long time"

What secret?

"Thus, NET is still in the game. Improbable. Tim got that award in 2011, because it was very clever, the Surveillance State often does not like clever."
Now I'm expected to go find out who Tim is in the context of Netlinkz and find an award bestowed upon him in 2011 and somehow recognise that this work the award was for upset some state surveillance actors.

"Is that clear enough, not that NET wins or even can even survive, but all these huge vendors are either going to have to disclose they were complicit with the State, at least Huawei is open about it, or US lawsuits are going to bring it all down."

No, Mr Callaway, it is not clear, it is not clear at all.

I'm not even going to bother continuing with my analysis of your post.

I appreciate you taking the time to try to explain why you made this topic, but man you suck at being clear and explaining things.

You're still trying to say things without actually saying it and that tells me that you're probably not real confident about what you're hinting at being true, or perhaps it is true but you want plausible deniability that never really actually said it.

NET Price at posting: 2.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
6 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 014 – Abu Dhabi wants to buy our 'true' oil and gas gem

Thursday's HotCopper trends: Second Amplia response, Race combo dosing | June 19

RML

Resolution Minerals charges further into antimony space with Horse Heaven acquisition

Almonty Industries – Now it is getting critical!

MEM

Many are concerned about global falling birthrates. This diverse stock has solutions

First 10 Last

Add to My Watchlist

What is My Watchlist?

A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

SPONSORED BY