I'm from the government and I'm here to help you ...
... NWI has received notice from the office of the Minister for Transport, Planning and Lands that implies that NWI does not have a priority right to develop Stanley Point Berths 3 and 4 in the Port of Port Hedland, Western Australia
WTF does 'implies' mean?
Here's my guess: AGO was under a misunderstanding that it could develop and use Stanley Berths 3 & 4, and that misunderstanding would transfer to FMS/Gina/MIN whoever? But how could that be right?
Aside from the indefinite nature of this news, I must say I'm having a blonde seniors moment. Could someone please (briefly) outline the significance of this statement for (1) AGO; (2) MIN; (3) FMG; (4) Gina/ Hancock Prospecting. Or is that not possible?
Ta, GW
AGO Price at posting:
3.8¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
