but surely terms like obnoxious, abusive, defamatory are defined by the person receiving the insults or whatever..... no troll would be allowed to define terms.
so where would you place the boundaries where camaderies such as "you old bastard " in the definition. it could be perceived as a threat?
and how many "unsolicited"(?) posts make harassment?
on a forum such as this there is a lot of argy bargy, but it seems to me that very few if any take personal offence.
and to this end, I congratulate the mods.... even if they do shuffle off my posts now and then. good job I say.
but truly I congratulate the posters from the most troll-like to the most benign who rarely get noticed for the civility of the discourse.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- News: Australia to introduce new laws to force media platforms to unmask online trolls
but surely terms like obnoxious, abusive, defamatory are defined...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online